Article
Colorado Proposition 128
Quin Friberg
In recent years, the balance between justice for victims and the opportunity for reform for offenders has been a deeply debated topic across the United States. As communities grapple with rising crime rates and the long-term implications of their criminal justice policies, measures like Colorado's Proposition 128 have come to the forefront as potential solutions to these complex issues.
Proposition 128 proposes a significant change in parole eligibility, specifically targeting offenders convicted of violent crimes such as second-degree murder, first-degree assault, class 2 felony kidnapping, sexual assault, first-degree arson, first-degree burglary, and aggravated robbery. Under this proposition, individuals convicted of these serious offenses on or after January 1, 2025, would be required to serve at least 85% of their imposed sentences before becoming eligible for parole, compared to the current law which allows offenders to serve only 75% of their sentence minus earned time. This represents a notable increase in the time served for these specific crimes. Furthermore, individuals with a history of violence, having been previously convicted of any two violent crimes, would need to serve their full sentences before parole eligibility.
Supporters of Proposition 128 argue that such measures are essential for maintaining public safety and ensuring that justice is served. By requiring offenders to serve the majority of their sentences, the proposition aims to provide a deterrent effect that could potentially reduce the incidence of violent crimes. This measure also serves as a form of assurance to victims and their families, affirming that the justice system recognizes the severity of the harm done and is committed to holding offenders accountable.
Moreover, Proposition 128 addresses concerns about the consistency and predictability of sentencing. By setting clear guidelines for parole eligibility, it eliminates some of the ambiguity that can lead to disparities in how sentences are served. This not only enhances fairness within the criminal justice system but also reinforces the rule of law by ensuring that sentences are meaningful and reflective of the gravity of the crimes committed.
Opponents of the measure may argue that it restricts opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders into society. However, the focus of Proposition 128 is on crimes of a particularly violent nature—crimes that inherently carry a greater risk to public safety and have deeper, longer-lasting impacts on victims and communities. Therefore, the longer incarceration periods mandated by Proposition 128 are not only a matter of retribution but are also protective and preventative measures.
Studies have indicated high rates of recidivism among violent criminals, suggesting that early release based on good behavior or parole does not significantly alter this trend. By requiring offenders to serve fuller sentences, Proposition 128 could enhance the deterrent effect, discouraging the commission of future offenses. Moreover, longer incarceration terms keep known violent offenders off the streets longer, directly contributing to safer communities.
In conclusion, Proposition 128 represents a firm stance on violent crime, prioritizing the safety and security of the public while upholding a standard of justice that aligns with the community's values. As Coloradans consider this proposition, it is crucial to weigh the broader implications for justice and safety in their communities. This measure not only offers a way to honor the suffering of victims and their families or loved ones but also acts as a preventative tool against the future perpetration of violent crimes.
share this
Related Articles
Related Articles


STAY UP TO DATE
GET PATH'S LATEST
Receive bi-weekly updates from the church, and get a heads up on upcoming events.
Contact Us

